Extinguishment Relations — Model L

Model A To Model L

Where Extinguishment Absorbs

Model L defines Extinguishment by co-option: each type's Ego block lands in the other's Contributive capacity, where it is capable and easy to use but subordinated to the receiving type's base operation.

The partner's output is not rejected as alien. It is recognised, received, and redirected before it can survive as an independent output.

Extinguishment Pair Menu

Same Register, Opposite Orientation

This page presents the Model L Extinguishment series: pairs where each type's primary output is absorbed into the other's Contributive support system and redirected toward the receiving base.

Intellect element illustration — Ti(N.) Intellect · LII

Reason element illustration — Te(N.) Reason · LIE

Ti(N.) Intellect / Te(N.) Reason — LII and LIE

In Model L, the Extinguishment relationship has a precise structural definition: each type's full Ego block — base (A1) and creative (A2) — sits exactly in the other's Contributive capacity, occupying the C1 Subsidiary and C4 Galvanizing positions. The Contributive capacity is Background/Facile: these functions are 3d capable, easy to focus on for extended periods, but of menial value and overwhelmingly co-opted in service of the type's own base operation.

Extinguishment relation illustration comparing LII × LIE

Habitus element illustration — Ti(S.) Habitus · LSI

Praxis element illustration — Te(S.) Praxis · LSE

Ti(S.) Habitus / Te(S.) Praxis — LSI and LSE

Same structural rule. LSI's Ego block Ti(S.)/Se(T.) sits exactly in LSE's Contributive capacity. LSE's Ego block Te(S.)/Si(T.) sits exactly in LSI's Contributive capacity.

Extinguishment relation illustration comparing LSI × LSE

Soul element illustration — Fi(N.) Soul · EII

Sentiment element illustration — Fe(N.) Sentiment · EIE

Fi(N.) Soul / Fe(N.) Sentiment — EII and EIE

Same structural rule. EII's Ego block Fi(N.)/Ne(F.) sits exactly in EIE's Contributive capacity. EIE's Ego block Fe(N.)/Ni(F.) sits exactly in EII's Contributive capacity.

Extinguishment relation illustration comparing EII × EIE

Animus element illustration — Fi(S.) Animus · ESI

Affect element illustration — Fe(S.) Affect · ESE

Fi(S.) Animus / Fe(S.) Affect — ESI and ESE

Same structural rule. ESI's Ego block Fi(S.)/Se(F.) sits exactly in ESE's Contributive capacity. ESE's Ego block Fe(S.)/Si(F.) sits exactly in ESI's Contributive capacity.

Extinguishment relation illustration comparing ESI × ESE

Observation element illustration — Si(T.) Observation · SLI

Actuation element illustration — Se(T.) Actuation · SLE

Si(T.) Observation / Se(T.) Actuation — SLI and SLE

Same structural rule. SLI's Ego block Si(T.)/Te(S.) sits exactly in SLE's Contributive capacity. SLE's Ego block Se(T.)/Ti(S.) sits exactly in SLI's Contributive capacity.

Extinguishment relation illustration comparing SLI × SLE

Stimulation element illustration — Si(F.) Stimulation · SEI

Impetus element illustration — Se(F.) Impetus · SEE

Si(F.) Stimulation / Se(F.) Impetus — SEI and SEE

Same structural rule. SEI's Ego block Si(F.)/Fe(S.) sits exactly in SEE's Contributive capacity. SEE's Ego block Se(F.)/Fi(S.) sits exactly in SEI's Contributive capacity.

Extinguishment relation illustration comparing SEI × SEE

Apprehension element illustration — Ni(T.) Apprehension · ILI

Ideation element illustration — Ne(T.) Ideation · ILE

Ni(T.) Apprehension / Ne(T.) Ideation — ILI and ILE

Same structural rule. ILI's Ego block Ni(T.)/Te(N.) sits exactly in ILE's Contributive capacity. ILE's Ego block Ne(T.)/Ti(N.) sits exactly in ILI's Contributive capacity.

Extinguishment relation illustration comparing ILI × ILE

Reverie element illustration — Ni(F.) Reverie · IEI

Inspiration element illustration — Ne(F.) Inspiration · IEE

Ni(F.) Reverie / Ne(F.) Inspiration — IEI and IEE

Same structural rule. IEI's Ego block Ni(F.)/Fe(N.) sits exactly in IEE's Contributive capacity. IEE's Ego block Ne(F.)/Fi(N.) sits exactly in IEI's Contributive capacity.

Extinguishment relation illustration comparing IEI × IEE

Extinguishment Summary

Output Consumed Through Absorption

File name	Pair	Shared sub-variants	Mechanism
extinguish-lii-lie	LII × LIE	N./T.	Structure absorbed into strategy / Strategy absorbed into structure
extinguish-lsi-lse	LSI × LSE	S./T.	Procedure absorbed into method / Method absorbed into procedure
extinguish-eii-eie	EII × EIE	N./F.	Conviction absorbed into incitement / Incitement absorbed into conviction
extinguish-esi-ese	ESI × ESE	S./F.	Particular bond absorbed into atmosphere / Atmosphere absorbed into particular verdict
extinguish-sli-sle	SLI × SLE	T./S.	Observation absorbed into governance / Governance absorbed into observation
extinguish-sei-see	SEI × SEE	F./S.	Ease absorbed into momentum / Force absorbed into sensation
extinguish-ili-ile	ILI × ILE	T./N.	Pattern absorbed into concept / Concept absorbed into pattern
extinguish-iei-iee	IEI × IEE	F./N.	Narrative absorbed into possibility / Possibility absorbed into narrative

The structural pattern is identical across all eight. Each type's full Ego block sits exactly in the other's Contributive capacity — 3d capable, Background/Facile, but co-opted in service of the receiving type's own base. The match is same domain, same sub-variant, opposite orientation: the most similar pairing possible while still being structurally distinct.

This is what distinguishes Extinguishment from every other relation type. The partner's output is not alien (Contrary), not strained (Super-Ego), not misread (Illusionary), not bypassed (Quasi-identity). It is recognised, received, and consumed — redirected into the receiving type's primary orientation without the intended output surviving intact. Each type produces something real. Nothing produced arrives on its own terms. The output is extinguished through absorption, not opposition.

Model A has no framework for this relation. The distinction between same-sub-variant and opposite-sub-variant pairings sharing domain and orientation does not exist at the 8-element level — both would appear as similar types engaging with overlapping elements. Model L makes the structural difference precise: same sub-variant produces Extinguishment; opposite sub-variant produces Illusionary. The register is the mechanism.